Over the past 12 months, several new permanent structures have been constructed and commissioned by the PLAAF, PLAGF and PLARF throughout the South Xinjiang and Tibet Military Districts, the most notable of which are highlighted below.
TMD's New Underground Facility & Technical Support Facility in Tsetang
TMD's New Underground Facility for TBM Storage at Tsetang
Linzhi Armaments Depots & LR-SAM Site
PLAGF Battlefield Surveillance Radar
PLAGF Battlefield Surveillance Sensors on Wheeled & Tracked Armoured Vehicles
The field artillery and fire-support systems fielded by the PLAGF (shown below) are all meant for providing immediate fire-support for advancing Battalion-sized PLAGF ground formations and are all armoured for protection from aerial straffing. The PLAGF believes in being self-sufficient in direct fire-support requirements, given the PLAAF’s inability to provide immediate air-support. This has been the case since 1962 and was also visible during the 1979 Sino-Vietnam war, when China refrained from using the PLAAF and thereby kept such conflicts limited in nature, just so that it would not provoke the then-USSR into taking any military action against China.
PTL-02 120mm Mortar
The construction of new underground storage facilities at Bangda, Gyantse, Shannan, South Xinjiang, Tsetang and Zanda for tactical ballistic missiles (TBM) indicates that the PLAAF, which has been unable to procure fourth-generation deep-strike interdictor aircraft, will continue to rely on the PLARF’s arsenal of DF-15B and DF-16 TBMs for targetting those forward and principal air bases and ALGs of the Indian Air Force that are likely to be used in the event of any future limited high-intensity conventional war between China and India.
Also, the PLAAF has not yet qualified on its J-10B/C M-MRCAs and J-111/J-14 H-MRCAs all those home-grown air-launched standoff PGMs that it had procured in the previous decade for its second-generation JH-7A deep-interdictor combat aircraft.
Thus, the PLAGF’s vulnerabilities are three-fold: 1) the military hardware developed by China’s domestic military-industrial complex remains unproven in battlefields and consequently is of questionable quality. 2) The bulk of the PLAGF’s human resources come from compulsory military conscription and consequently professionalism/combat proficiency of its combat arms remains highly questionable. 3) The PLAGF’s combat integration with the PLAAF remains minimal and consequently the former remains highly vulnerable to hostile tactical air interdiction and deep air-strikes.